|
Written by Shane Jones
|
|
Tuesday, 01 April 2008 |
|
Many people are looking to the Democrats, and in particular to Barack Obama for a real change, especially when it comes to the Iraq war. But on the question of war and foreign policy, does Obama really differ from the current White House administration, or from his party mate Hillary Clinton, or for that matter, from the entire DC political establishment?
You can tell a lot about a person based on the company he or she keeps. Obama is backed by people like billionaire Warren Buffet, who has made his fortune forming and investing in companies that exploit literally millions of people around the globe. Obama’s main foreign policy advisor is Zbigniew Brzezinski, a staunch anti-communist who was a key player in the U.S. support and aid to the counter-revolutionary Mujahedin in Afghanistan and Pakistan. |
|
|
Written by Josh Lucker
|
|
Friday, 07 March 2008 |
According to the historians of the ruling class, “progressives” in the early 20th Century developed the primary system in order to counteract the control of political parties by the “party bosses.” In order to do this (so it is claimed), they removed control of the selection of candidates from the hands of the parties themselves and placed it in the hands of the states. But far from removing control from the party bosses, this merely gives the two-party system the states’ stamp of approval. In most other countries, the nomination of candidates is the responsibility of parties and their members. |
|
|
Written by John Peterson
|
|
Thursday, 07 February 2008 |
|
The U.S. election cycle is in full swing a full nine months before voters actually go to the polls on November 4th. On "Super Tuesday" registered voters in 24 states came out to vote in caucuses and primary elections |
|
|
Written by Shane Jones
|
|
Friday, 18 January 2008 |
|
In the run up to any election it is not at all uncommon to hear anything and everything promised by candidates hoping to win votes. For those following U.S. electoral politics right now, it is clear that the big business candidates are presenting their respective religiosities as credentials of a sort to prospective voters. The open pandering to the ‘faith vote” displays the cynical depths the representatives of the ruling class are willing to go to win votes. This is not simply a harmless phenomenon but a noxious indication of the rottenness of the system. |
|
|
Written by Zach McCall
|
|
Thursday, 17 January 2008 |
The holiday season has passed, and a good deal of us are probably financially strained from spending our hard-earned money on gifts and food for the season. We also face rising energy costs, as oil has hit a record $100 per barrel. On the other hand, CEOs have been receiving large bonuses. Let us compare how well the working class and the executives have fared over the holiday season. |
|
|
Written by Karl Belin
|
|
Wednesday, 16 January 2008 |
Fifteen protesters were arrested on December 20 in New Orleans, Louisiana. Standing outside of the City Council building, they demanded that the council not issue permits to the Housing Authority of New Orleans to demolish 4,500 public housing units damaged (and, in many cases, only partially damaged) by Hurricane Katrina. This is yet another attack on the workers of New Orleans who have been through hell and, well, high water. |
|
|
Written by Ed Riley
|
|
Tuesday, 15 January 2008 |
|
It is frustrating that the American working class has no party that represents their interests. The vast majority of the 300 million people in this country are workers and their families. They are people who sell their labor power to the boss and depend on the wages and benefits to feed their families. If they are unemployed for a stretch, they can lose everything. However, we must be clear: the working class has tremendous potential power. Not one item would be produced in a factory, not a street would be cleaned, electricity would not be generated and communication could not function as it does, without the labor of the workers.
Just as workers have learned that if we band together at work into a union, where our strength is united into a single force, we can more effectively fight the boss, if we band together into a political party, created by and under the democratic control of the labor movement, we can better fight the government of the employers. |
|
|
Written by David May
|
|
Monday, 17 December 2007 |
“Slay must go!” was the rallying cry on the steps of City Hall in St. Louis on October 21st, and this call was repeated again with greater volume as the recall campaign held its second rally on November 18th. The recall campaign aimed against the Democratic Mayor was sparked by his recent firing of Sherman George, the first black fire chief in the United States, after George’s refusal to use a testing procedure in the fire department that blatantly disadvantages black candidates versus candidates of other racial backgrounds. Workers and youth, black and white, are now fighting back against the city’s institutional racism and anti-worker policies. |
|
|
Written by Shane Jones
|
|
Friday, 07 December 2007 |
|
Given the lack of a mass working class party in the U.S. and the instability that characterizes the current state of affairs on a domestic and global level, there is enormous pressure to “vote for somebody”. It is therefore not surprising that some workers and youth are curious about Republican Congressman Ron Paul’s bid for the Presidency. His primary draw is his vocal “anti-war” stance, which gives him some distance from the majority of Republicans and Democrats in Congress. It is mainly on this issue that his supporters find support for the so-called “Ron Paul Revolution”. An example of this could be seen in the nation-wide regional anti-war demos of October 27th, where small contingents of his supports came out in various cities to promote his campaign.
But does Ron Paul offer anything that can truly be called a “revolution”, or is he more of the same from the capitalists’ ranks? Should workers and students in the anti-war movement, or in general, give him support in any way? |
|
|
Written by Zach McCall
|
|
Thursday, 06 December 2007 |
Along with many other sectors of the ruling class, the arms industry is shifting to the “left” and backing Hillary Clinton. In a reversal of their previous approach to campaign funding, the top U.S. five arms manufacturers have given a combined $103,900 to Democratic candidates, as opposed to $86,800 to GOP candidates. They have all but deserted Republican John McCain, a diehard supporter of the war, as evidenced by the fact that he received just $19,200 from the weapons industry compared to the $52,600 Hillary has received so far. |
|
|
Written by Shamus Cooke
|
|
Wednesday, 05 December 2007 |
|
It often takes direct experience to better understand one’s surroundings; whether it be a toddler’s mastering of cause and effect, or for our purposes, realizing the Democratic Party’s true nature. This latest life lesson has been taught to us by the Democrats themselves, who, public opinion cast aside, have continued to support the Iraq War, not to mention other collusions with the Republicans on many matters that represent “high crimes and misdemeanors”.
Millions who had sincere illusions in the Democrats have been shocked at how rapidly the illusory divide between the two parties has disappeared, especially over the last few years. Explaining this process in a way that doesn’t place the blame on this-or-that individual becomes increasingly urgent. We must explain the common class interests shared by both parties so that working people can begin the process of building our own political alternative. Otherwise, the current situation of war, inequality, and racism will only continue to intensify. |
|
|