Letters do not necessarily reflect the views of Socialist Appeal.
Please send us your letters, comments, questions, criticisms, or
sugestions:
wil@socialistappeal.org
Wellred
PO Box 4244
St. Paul, MN 55104
|
|
Written by JL, U.S. Air Force, Active Duty
|
|
Monday, 14 April 2008 |
|
In this letter, JL describes the free healthcare he has been getting in the military, pointing out that the military can do well in providing free healthcare in spite of its poor and bureaucratic management. He then goes on to explain how large sums of money are wasted through insurance companies. In short, if the military can provide free healthcare, there is no reason why the US government cannot. |
|
|
Written by A.B. Blunt in Providence, RI
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 2008 |
|
Bitter denunciations of monopolistic greed poured from the podium at a public hearing in Providence on January 17th. Subscribers in the “direct pay” class of Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island hoped these words would block a rate-increase request filed with the state Health Insurance Commissioner in November, 2007. If the commissioner approves the request, as many fear he will, subscribers will face an average rate increase of 12.7 percent in their monthly premiums.
Rhode Islanders traveled on one of the coldest nights of the winter to attend the hearing in downtown Providence. Following opening arguments from the Blue Cross attorney and then the assistant state Attorney General, a Blue Cross subscriber and attorney by profession was the first to speak. Testifying on the excessive costs of health care for himself and his family, as well as the rising cost of food, gasoline, and heating oil, the speaker demonstrated the hardship he and his family would suffer if rates were to increase. The men and women who followed him testified to the same troubles, and in words of desperation, disgust, and outrage, implored the commission to deny the rate increase. |
|
|
Written by Joe
|
|
Sunday, 27 January 2008 |
|
In this brief letter, Joe shows his interest in a previous SA article on contractors in Iraq and explains why mercenaries cannot be controlled like a regular army. |
|
|
Written by Roberto Carlos
|
|
Friday, 25 January 2008 |
|
In this letter, Roberto Carlos depicts his experience working in a movie theater and the problems young workers have to put up with on a regular basis. |
|
|
Written by Michael Broumas
|
|
Tuesday, 22 January 2008 |
|
In this letter, Michael Broumas explains his background and how events and the IMT's orientation to the traditional working class organzations persuaded him to join the WIL. |
|
|
Written by Bud Deraps
|
|
Wednesday, 19 December 2007 |
|
In this letter, Bud Deraps makes note of the Prison Industrial Complex (PIC) joining with the Military Industrial Complex (PIC), making huge profits in the process. The increasing number of private prisons, laws made to fill them up more easily, and corporate interest in prison labor are noted as well. |
|
|
Written by Chris Ryan
|
|
Tuesday, 18 December 2007 |
|
In this letter, Chris Ryan explains the role of dissidents in the past, noting how their sacrifices have brought gains. He notes that there are those called dissidents that opposed the new Chrysler contract, and that these dissidents and other workers must unite to overcome the failures that a are a product of workers' disunity. |
|
|
Written by TT
|
|
Friday, 02 November 2007 |
|
In this letter, TT describes his background and his interest in the WIL. |
|
|
Written by Nick B.
|
|
Sunday, 05 August 2007 |
|
This is a letter from Nick B., indicating that he has been considering joining the WIL, and wants to discuss this with WIL comrades. He also makes note of his background and the necessity of practice. |
|
|
Written by Bob Witaek
|
|
Tuesday, 03 July 2007 |
|
A party in opposition to the war would have a 100% or very near solid block against the funding. That the vote split is only politics. This tactic only confuses those who refuse to take the proper step of completely dumping that pro-war institution known as the “Democratic Party.” |
|
|
Written by Martin Christiansen
|
|
Monday, 07 May 2007 |
|
Often times when I worked at FedEx, with its rampant disregard for worker safety, I pondered how nice and healthy it would be to work in an office environment, not having to worry about things like a limb getting maimed by unprotected machinery, inhalation of harmful chemical fumes or exposure to level 3 radioactive materials in heavy lead containers. Of course, my reality perception was given a twist once I began working at the local newspaper in the Art Dept. |
|
|
|