|
Written by Timothy Kaminski
|
|
Tuesday, 19 June 2007 |
The UAW will confront Detroit auto makers at the bargaining table in July for a new national contract. In what will prove to be one of the UAW’s biggest challenges since the union’s birth, this contract will bear the imprint of the wholesale restructuring of the American auto industry. When Cerberus Capital Management paid $7.4 billion to take control of Chrysler on May 13, 2007, the challenge to the Union was official: “Are you ready to negotiate with a private equity firm which specializes in gutting troubled companies?” The UAW’s position on Chrysler will undoubtedly influence negotiations with General Motors and Ford. Cerberus wants to cut costs to make money off its investment. Contract talks open up a golden opportunity for the bosses to cut costs at the expense of the workers on the assembly lines. Cutting benefits which previous generations sacrificed, fought for and in some instances, died for, is what is at risk for auto workers in 2007. |
|
|
Written by Mark Vorpahl
|
|
Thursday, 03 May 2007 |
|
On April 14th in Portland Oregon, at the doors of NAFTA-loving Democratic Senator Ron Wyden’s office, as many as 300 trade unionists came out in a spirited rally representing occupations that ranged from nurses to longshoremen. They were there to protest mass layoffs at a Daimler-Chrysler owned plant that manufactures Freightliner trucks. They were also demanding that Senator Wyden vote against the renewal of Fast Track which eliminates Congressional review, mark-up and oversight of trade agreements, while giving large corporations special access to trade negotiators. These trade unionists saw a direct connection between the mass layoffs and the free trade policies Fast Track has helped to mold. |
|
|
Written by James Holt
|
|
Thursday, 03 May 2007 |
According to a survey conducted by the Teamsters in early April 2006, the rank and file membership, by a three-to-one margin, wanted the Teamsters to start early negotiations with UPS. This will come as no surprise to those UPS Teamsters who for the last five years have lived under what the IBT officialdom dubbed “the best contract ever”. |
|
|
Written by Editorial for Socialist Appeal Issue 30
|
|
Monday, 30 April 2007 |
Every May Day, millions of workers around the world celebrate International Workers’ Day – the original Labor Day. Here in the U.S., Labor Day is officially celebrated in September, and has all but lost its original political and class character. It is seen by many as little more than an end-of-summer barbecue. But the real origins of May Day can be traced right here to the United States and the bitter struggles of working men and women for better wages, rights, conditions, and the eight-hour day. |
|
|
Written by the Workers International League
|
|
Monday, 05 March 2007 |
|
Based on the article DaimlerChrysler “Family” puts 13,000 of its “Children” up for Adoption by David May and Tim Kaminski.
|
|
|
Written by James Holt
|
|
Saturday, 03 March 2007 |
In the recent election for union leadership, members of the Teamsters union were confronted with a choice. On the one side stood Jimmy Hoffa Jr., the incumbent president, who campaigned on the basis of forming a “partnership” with the employers and whose family has had long-standing relations with organized crime. On the other side stood the challenger, Tom Leedham, who has pressed for mobilizing the membership to act in their own interests and strike, if that proves necessary, in order to win gains. |
|
|
Written by Ted Grant
|
|
Saturday, 17 February 2007 |
Originally published in 1975, this article was an answer to Chrysler's plans to sack thousands of workers in Britain. It clearly posed the demand for nationalization under workers' control and management. The fact that over 30 years later we are yet again faced with the same situation, highlights our point that there is simply no solution to the problems of working people within the narrow limits of capitalism. We are told that we can be part of the "team" if we play by the rules - but the bosses change the rules whenever they want! The bosses will always put their profits above the interests of the workers and society as a whole. Under capitalism, the "song remains the same". Workers need a new tune - nationalization under workers' democratic control! |
|
|
Written by David May & Tim Kaminski
|
|
Saturday, 17 February 2007 |
On February 14th, the DaimlerChrysler
AG Corporation announced sweeping plant closings and job cuts for its
U.S. operations which will go into effect in 2008 and 2009. The company
announced the closing of the Newark, Delaware plant as well as the cutting
a total of 13,000 jobs across the US and Canada by 2009, mainly through
shift elimination. The Cleveland, Ohio parts distribution center will
be idled as well. As part of this "restructuring" plan, the
company will cut U.S. production capacity by 400,000 units through 2009.
If this wasn't enough, DaimlerChrysler also announced that it is exploring
options to sell off the Chrysler division altogether. No wonder many
workers are calling these announcements the "St. Valentine's Day
Massacre".
|
|
|
Written by Shane Jones
|
|
Saturday, 03 February 2007 |
|
Following the Great Depression and the mighty rise of industrial unions in the U.S., the capitalist class made some concessions to the labor movement because they were worried an all-out revolutionary situation could erupt. These concessions, in the form of the New Deal programs and the National Labor Relations Act were intended to save capitalism. But once the flood-tide of the class struggle ebbed, the bosses moved to take back those concessions, which U.S. capitalism could no longer tolerate. Taft-Hartley was the first major example of this.
|
|
|
Written by Shane Jones
|
|
Tuesday, 30 January 2007 |
|
A decade since the last increase, and after several Democrats used the issue to win votes while campaigning during the mid-term elections, the House of Representatives voted to raise the Federal minimum wage on January 10th, after a similar bill was voted down in the Senate a week earlier. The House legislation is now en route to the Senate where Republicans are seeking to add a “compromise” of more tax-cuts for businesses. Given many tax cuts they have already received over the past period, this is less a compromise than the norm. Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has indicated that the Democrats will vote along side the Republicans for the pro-business additions to the bill. |
|
|